-
Question: If you could swap jobs with one of the Scientists in this zone for a day - which one would you pick?
-
anon answered on 22 Mar 2010:
What a cool question!
I was initially tempted to say I’d try Pam’s job, but I’ve already been a PhD student and I know exactly how hard that is! As a result, I would not take on Pam’s work, not even if you paid me.
Freya’s day starts with coffee and that’s a winner for me but I think I would find that I would end up creating really strange psycological experiments for people and animals alike. So probably not hers.
Louise always comes across as a lovely individual and she gets to play with chickens so I’d have to try hers. BUT my only knowledge is with frozen ones, ready for baking, SO I’d probably have to choose Katy’s job in which they throw frozen chickens into jet engines.
Katy has the best of both worlds, she gets to fly round the world and do experiments. Kinda like me! only she probably gets paid more!
🙂
Comments
Freya commented on :
Cheers Louise! There’s a nice web page about blood sharing in vampire bats here: http://www.bio.davidson.edu/people/vecase/behavior/Spring2002/Perry/altruism.html
The existence of reciprocity (“you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours”) in animals other than humans is quite a hot topic in cooperation research.
Louise commented on :
No worries – if I ever get to come to Oxford and I’ll have to come and check out your work. You can be the scientist I spend a day with! My favourite scientist is not a million miles away from your office door – literally – anyway 🙂
Thanks for the article. Do they still investigate cooperation using iterated prisoner’s dilemma type stuff? Or this that really old hat now? I loved all the stuff about evolutionarily stable strategies and Hawk/Dove models. Just wish I could remember it!
Freya commented on :
You’d be welcome! There is a vast, sprawling literature on prisoner’s dilemma and game theory… which has little overlap with the ecological/evolutionary literature. We could have a really long and heated conversation about this, but in short my opinion (fwiw) is that a lot of the game theoretical work is really artificial. I think it definitely has a use, but it’s gone beyond being used as a tool to becoming this whole little universe geared to explaining situation that might not actually exist. Though I do use game theory-based ideas in my work because they are handy starting points. This paragraph might make no sense as I’ve been in since 8 and had no coffee yet 😀